“Perhaps the logic of it all ought to be turned back upon the opponents of preterism. How can they dare to suggest that Jesus really didnot fulfill His promises that He said He would and in the way that He said He would? If it is scary to 21st century ears that the second coming has already happened, how much more scary should it be to suggest that the second coming has notyet taken place?”
“Wavering Partial-Preterist, toes in the shallow end, unable to jump all the way into Full Preterism.” – “I find most arguments against Full Preterism to be weak at best, and hypocritically arrogant and dangerous at worst. As one who hasn’t yet been able to bite the bullet and join the Full Preterist camp, I am particularly sensitive to bad arguments from partial preterists.”
“The question, then, is simply this: Is it accurate to classify John Humphrey Noyes as an early proponent of hyper-preterism? After re-examining the evidence, I believe that the answer is yes, and I will seek to defend that answer in what follows.”
FREE BOOK: The Destruction of Jerusalem –George Peter Holford – “Absolute and irresistible proof of the divine origin of Christianity : including a narrative of the calamities which befel the Jews, so far as they tend to verify Our Lord’s predictions.”
FREE BOOK: The Second Coming of Jesus – G.F. Taylor (1912) “Others think that all the Scriptures about the coming of the Lord refer to the destruction of Jerusalem under Titus in A. D. 70. Such teachers substitute Titus for the Lord. However, if this is probable, what shall we do with Rev. 22: 12: “Behold, I come quickly”? Jesus spoke these words twenty-six years after the destruction of Jerusalem. So we are driven to look elsewhere for the coming of the Lord.” | The Jerusalem Tribulation not the Great One