Jean Le Clerc
“The world manifestly improves every day, and grows wiser than it was”
Grotius / LeClerc The Truth of the Christian Religion | Annotations on the New Testament: Compiled from the Best Critical Authorities (1829) | The Lives of the Primitive Fathers | On the Choice of Religious Opinions
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID
“16.On the other hand, some have regarded the prophecy as one already fulfilled. So Grotius, Wetstein, Le Clerc, Whitby, Schöttgen, Nösselt, Krause, and Harduin. All these concur in referring the “advent of the Lord” to the coming of Christ in the destruction of Jerusalem“.
20. Le Clerc holds the apostasy to be the rebellion of the Jewish people against the yoke of Rome : the man of sin, the rebel Jews, and especially their leader Simon, son of Giora, whose atrocities are related in Josephus: every one called God, &c. denotes the government : – “that which hindereth” is whatever hindered the open breaking out of the rebellion, — partly the influence of those Jews in office who dissuaded the war, – partly fear of the Roman armies : and he that hindereth, on one side, the “Roman prefect,” – on the other, the “chief men of the nation, King Agrippa and most of the high priests.” The mystery of lawlessness is the rebellious ambition, which under the cloke of Jewish independence and zeal for the law of Moses, was even then at work, and at length broke openly forth.” (The New Testament for English Readers, First Thessalonians, Introduction, p 86)
J.P. Dabney (1829)
Matthew 10 “23. Till the Son of man be come : Le Clerc supposes that this coming, in the present instance, can only well be referred to the destruction of the Jewish state and of Jerusalem ; and so also Whitby. Grotius would understand it of the full effusion of the Holy Spirit at the day of Pentecost ; while Priestley, less naturally and probably than either, applies it to Christ’s second coming, to raise the dead and judge the world. For this explication, he assigns no reasons.” (Annotations on the New Testament:compiled from the best critical authorities, p. 18)
Jean le Clerc [Clericus] (March 19, 1657 – January 8, 1736), Swiss Protestant theologian, was born at Geneva, where his father, Stephen Le Clerc, was professor of Greek.
The family originally belonged to the neighborhood of Beauvais in France, and several of its members acquired some name in literature. Jean Le Clerc applied himself to the study of philosophy under JR Chouet (1642-1731) the Cartesian, and attended the theological lectures of P Mestrezat, Franz Turretin and Louis Tronchin (1629-1705). In 1678-1679 he spent some time at Grenoble as tutor in a private family; on his return to Geneva he passed his examinations and received ordination. Soon afterwards he went to Saumur, where in 1679 were published Literii de Sancto Amore Epistolae Theologicae (Irenopoli: Typis Philaleihianis), usually attributed to him; they deal with the doctrine of the Trinity, the hypostatic union of the two natures in Jesus Christ, original sin, and the like, in a manner sufficiently far removed from that of the conventional orthodoxy of the period.
In 1682 he went to London, where he remained six months, preaching on alternate Sundays in the Walloon church and in the Savoy chapel. Passing to Amsterdam he was introduced to John Locke and to Philip von Limborch, professor at the Remonstrant college; the acquaintance with Limborch soon ripened into a close friendship, which strengthened his preference for the Remonstrant theology, already favorably known to him by the writings of his grand-uncle, Stephan Curedlaeus (d. 1645) and by those of Simon Episcopius.
A last attempt to live at Geneva, made at the request of relatives there, satisfied him that the theological atmosphere was uncongenial, and in 1684 he finally settled at Amsterdam, first as a moderately successful preacher, until ecclesiastical jealousy shut him out from that career, and afterwards as professor of philosophy, belles-lettres and Hebrew in the Remonstrant seminary. This appointment, which he owed to Limborch, he held from 1684, and in 1752 on the death of his friend he was called to occupy the chair of church history also.
His suspected Socinianism was the cause, it is said, of his exclusion from the chair of dogmatic theology. Apart from his literary labours, Le Clerc’s life at Amsterdam was uneventful. In 1691 be married a daughter of Gregorio Leti. From 1728 onward he was subject to repeated strokes of paralysis, and he died on the 8th of January.
A full catalogue of the publications of Le Clerc will be found, with biographical material, in E and E Haag’s France Protestante (where seventy-three works are enumerated), or in JG de Chauffepié’s Dictionnaire.
Only the most important of these can be mentioned here. In 1685 he published Sentimens de quelques thologiens de Hollande sur l’histoire critique du Vieux Testament composée par le P. Richard Simon, in which, while pointing out what he believed to be the faults of that author, he undertook to make some positive contributions towards a right understanding of the Bible. Among these last may be noted his argument against the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch, his views as to the manner in which the five books were composed, his opinions (singularly free for the time in which he lived) on the subject of inspiration in general, and particularly as to the inspiration of Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Canticles.
Richard Simon’s Réponse (1686) elicited from Le Clerc a Defence des sentimens in the same year, which was followed by a new Réponse (1687). In 1692 appeared his Logica sive Ars Ratiocinandi, and also Ontologia et Pneumatologia; these, with the Physica (1695), are incorporated with the Opera Philosophica, which have passed through several editions.
In 1693 his series of Biblical commentaries began with that on Genesis; the series was not completed until 1731. The portion relating to the New Testament books included the paraphrase and notes of Henry Hammond. Le Clerc’s commentary had a great influence in breaking up traditional prejudices and showing the necessity for a more scientific inquiry into the origin and meaning of the biblical books, It was on all sides hotly attacked.
His Ars Critica appeared in 1696, and, in continuation, Epistolae Criticae et Ecclesiasticae in 1700. Le Clerc’s new edition of the Apostolic Fathers of Johann Cotekrius (1627-1686), published in 1698, marked an advance in the critical study of these documents.
But the greatest literary influence of Le Clerc was probably that which he exercised over his contemporaries by means of the serials, or, if one may so call them, reviews, of which he was editor. These were the Bibliothèque universelle et historique (Amsterdam, 25 vols 12 mu., 1686-1693), begun with JC de la Croze; the Bibliothèque choisie (Amsterdam, 28 vols,, 1703-1713); and the Bibliothèque ancienne et moderne, (29 vols, 1714-1726).
See Le Clerc’s Parrhasiana ou penses sur des matires de critique, d’histoire, de morale, et de politique: avec la defense de divers ouvrages de M. L. C. par Théodore Parrhase (Amsterdam, 1699); and Vita et opera ad annum MDCCXL, amici ejus opusculu in philosophicis Clerici operibus subjiciendum, also attributed to himself. The supplement to Hammond’s notes was translated into English in 1699, Parrhesiana, or Thoughts on Several Subjects, in 1700, the Harmony of the Gospels in 1701, and Twelve Dissertations out of 211. Le Clerc’s Genesis in 1696.
What do YOU think ?
Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
The Mossad is the antichrist. The Jews are the puppets of satan and will destroy mankind very soon, body and spirit both will be destroyed because man is evil. God is the composit spirit of all mankind. When Man’s spirit dies God will be dead and gone and Satan’s mission accomplished. He is the Garbage man of the Universe sent to dispose of the garbage the Human race, the Jews do all his work for him so his hands are never soiled. The Human race is getting exactly what they deserve. Soon you will all be reduced to baby eating canabals, after WWIII the final war started like all the others by the antichrist, Satans best weapon against mankind, the Jews were put here to destroy all mankind.