Home>2015-57-Main Body-Benjamin Blayney

Church-State Relations and the Book of Revelation
An Introduction to The Parousia: A Careful Look at the New Testament Doctrine of the Lord’s Second Coming
by James Stuart Russell (1878) // Written by 
Todd Dennis, Curator


 

FREE ONLINE BOOKS

Modern Preterism
Modern Preterism Study Archive
Study Archive

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Hyper Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

MODERN PRETERISTS
(Major Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation in Past)

Firmin Abauzit
Jay Adams
Luis Alcazar
Greg Bahnsen
Beausobre, L’Enfant
Jacques Bousset
John L. Bray
David Brewster
Dr. John Brown
Thomas Brown
Newcombe Cappe
David Chilton
Adam Clarke

Henry Cowles
Ephraim Currier
R.W. Dale
Gary DeMar
P.S. Desprez
Johann Eichhorn
Heneage Elsley
F.W. Farrar
Samuel Frost
Kenneth Gentry
Steve Gregg
Hugo Grotius
Francis X. Gumerlock
Henry Hammond
Hampden-Cook
Friedrich Hartwig
Adolph Hausrath
Thomas Hayne
J.G. Herder
Timothy Kenrick
J. Marcellus Kik
Samuel Lee
Peter Leithart
John Lightfoot
Benjamin Marshall
F.D. Maurice
Marion Morris
Ovid Need, Jr
Wm. Newcombe
N.A. Nisbett
Gary North
Randall Otto
Zachary Pearce
Andrew Perriman
Beilby Porteus
Ernst Renan
Gregory Sharpe
Fr. Spadafora
R.C. Sproul
Moses Stuart
Milton S. Terry
Herbert Thorndike
C. Vanderwaal
Foy Wallace
Israel P. Warren
Chas Wellbeloved
J.J. Wetstein
Richard Weymouth
Daniel Whitby
George Wilkins
E.P. Woodward

 


Free Online Books

Free Online Books

Apocalyptic | Apocryphal | Archeology | Lectures | Biographies | Dead Sea Scrolls | First Century History | Foreign | Jewish Sources | Josephus

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Hyper Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

 1-1000

070: ClementFirst Epistle of Clement

075: Baruch: Apocalypse Of Baruch

075: Barnabus: Epistle of Barnabus

090: Esdras 2 / 4 Ezra

100: Odes of Solomon

150: JustinDialogue with Trypho

150: MelitoHomily of the Pascha

175: Irenaeus: Against Heresies

175: Clement of Alexandria: Stromata

198: Tertullian: Answer to the Jews

230Origen: The Principles | Commentary on Matthew Commentary on John | Against Celsus

248CyprianAgainst the Jews

260VictorinusCommentary on the Apocalypse “Alcasar, a Spanish Jesuit, taking a hint from Victorinus, seems to have been the first (AD 1614) to have suggested that the Apocalyptic prophecies did not extend further than to the overthrow of Paganism by Constantine.”

310: Peter of Alexandria

310: EusebiusDivine Manifestation of our Lord

312: EusebiusProof of the Gospel

319: AthanasiusOn the Incarnation

320: EusebiusHistory of the Martyrs

325: Eusebius: Ecclesiastical History

345: Aphrahat: Demonstrations

367: Athanasius: The Festal Letters

370: Hegesippus: The Ruin of Jerusalem

386: Chrysostom: Matthew and Mark

387: Chrysostom: Against the Jews

408: JeromeCommentary on Daniel

417: AugustineOn Pelagius

426: AugustineThe City of God

428: AugustineHarmony

420: Cassian: Conferences

600: Veronica Legend

800: AquinasEternity of the World

 


1000-2006

FUTURIST
HISTORICAL
MODERN

1265: AquinasCatena Aurea

1543: Luther: On the Jews

1555: Calvin: Harmony on Evangelists

1556: Jewel: Scripture

1586: Douay-Rheims Bible

1598: Jerusalem’s Misery ; The dolefull destruction of faire Ierusalem by Tytus, the Sonne of Vaspasian

1603: Nero : A New Tragedy

1613: Carey: The Fair Queen of Jewry

1614: AlcasarVestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi

1654: UssherThe Annals of the World

1658: LightfootCommentary from Hebraica

1677: Crowne – The Destruction of Jerusalem

1764: LardnerFulfilment of our Saviour’s Predictions

1776: Edwards: History of Redemption

1785ChurtonProphecies Respecting the Destruction of Jerusalem

1801: PorteusOur Lord’s Prophecies

1802: Nisbett: The Coming of the Messiah

1805: JortinRemarks on Ecclesiastical History

1810: Clarke: Commentary On the Whole Bible

1816: WilkinsDestruction of Jerusalem Related to Prophecies

1824: Galt: The Bachelor’s Wife

1840: SmithThe Destruction of Jerusalem

1841: CurrierThe Second Coming of Christ

1842: Bastow : A (Preterist) Bible Dictionary

1842: StuartInterpretation of Prophecy

1843: Lee: Dissertations on Eusebius

1845: StuartCommentary on Apocalypse

1849: LeeInquiry into Prophecy

1851: LeeVisions of Daniel and St. John

1853NewcombeObservations on our Lord’s Conduct as Divine Instructor

1854: Chamberlain: Restoration of Israel

1854: Fairbairn: The Typology of Scripture

1859: “Lee of Boston”: Eschatology

1861: MauriceLectures on the Apocalypse

1863: Thomas Lewin : The Siege of Jerusalem

1865: Desprez: Daniel (Renounced Full Preterism)

1870: Fall of Jerusalem and the Roman Conquest

1871DaleJewish Temple and Christian Church (PDF)

1879: WarrenThe Parousia

1882: FarrarThe Early Days of Christianity

1883: Milton S. TerryBiblical Hermeneutics

1888: Henty: For The Temple

1891: Farrar: Scenes in the days of Nero

1896: Lee : A Scholar of a Past Generation

1902Church: Story of the Last Days of Jerusalem

1917: Morris: Christ’s Second Coming Fulfilled

1985: LeeJerusalem; Rome; Revelation (PDF)

1987: ChiltonThe Days of Vengeance

2001: Fowler: Jesus – The Better Everything

2006: M. Gwyn Morgan – AD69 – The Year of Four Emperors

Print and Use For Personal Bookmark or Placement in Bookstores

DANIEL’S WEEKS COMPLETELY FULFILLED BY AD70, TAUGHT BY WELL-RESPECTED MEN

DISSERTATION BY WAY OF
INQUIRY INTO THE TRUE IMPORT
AND APPLICATION OF THE VISION

DAN. IX. ver. 20. to the end, usually called,

DANIEL’S PROPHECY OF SEVENTY WEEKS
With some Occasional Remarks on the very learned Professor J. D. Michaelis‘ Letters to Sir John Pringle on the Same Subject.

By BENJAMIN BLAYNEY, B. D.

Fellow of Hertford College, and one of the Preachers at His Majesty’s Chapel at Whitehall.

CLICK HERE FOR PDF FILE OF ENTIRE BOOK

See Also Benjamin BlayneyDavid ChiltonHugo GrotiusThomas HayneBenjamin MarshallGregory SharpeHerbert Thorndike // Daniel’s Seventy Weeks Study Archive

“My very learned and respectable friend, and predecessor in this College, now Bishop of Dromore, to whom at his request I had sent an extra of the eight last verses of the Ninth chapter of Daniel, from the ancient version of the Seventy, lately discovered and published at Rome, most obligingly returned his acknowledgments with the following ingenious remarks.

 “The numbers which in this version are found different from those in the common text he thinks,” may be thus accounted for. “Seventy weeks add seven weeks are 539 years. Now “Cyrus’s decree according to all the Chronologers was “issued 536 years before Christ; and if we reckon by “hebdomads of years, we cannot come nearer to Christ’s “birth. Add to the sixty two years (mentioned ver. 26 and 27. in this Greek version) the surplus of three “years in the period of seventy seven weeks; and you “have the year LXV after Christ, the year immediately preceding the Jewish war. This too is called “Chris’s coming, Matt. xvi. 28. xxiv. 3. &c. ( Thus the period of weeks refers to the birth of Christ “with a sufficient exactness for prophetical language; “and that of years marks his coming in another sense “with historical precision”  Thus the year of our Lord LXX, “when the city was destroyed, and the sacrifice ceased, “was the middle year of the week.”

What do YOU think ?

Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
Comment Box Disabled For Security